Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Contact Us Feed Back Site Map Home Bulletin Board
About Codex
Codex Meetings
FAO/WHO Expert Committees & Consultations
Key Issues
National Codex Contact Point (India)
National Codex Resource Centre
National Codex Committee
Shadow Committees of the National Codex Committee
Who's Who
Working Procedures for Codex India
Training Manual on Codex
What's New
Relevant Sites

KEY ISSUES

TRACEABILITY

Traceability has been defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 8402) as the" ability to trace the history, application or location of any entity by means of recorded identification".

Traceability is closely linked with product identification. It may relate to:

  • the origin of materials and parts (food products and ingredients);
  • the product processing history;
  • the distribution and location of the product after delivery.

The matter of traceability has been raised in various Codex Committees and Task Forces, including Codex Committee on Food Import and Export Certification Systems, Food Hygiene, Food Labelling, Food Additives and Contaminants, Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Task Forces on Animal Feeding and Foods Derived from Biotechnology.

The concept of "traceability" has already been included in many Codex texts and is linked to product identification and recall procedures. Codex texts do not currently apply traceability to the origin of foods and ingredients with the exception of the Country of Origin provisions of the General Standard for the Labelling of Pre-packaged Foods and the Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods.

RECENT DISCUSSIONS

Traceability was first introduced formally for discussion at the 9th Session of CCFICS held during 11-15 December 2000 in Perth, Australia.

Thereafter at the request of CCFICS a background paper was presented at the 24th Session of the Codex Commission held during 2-7 July 2001 to consider means of dealing with it within the framework of Codex in a uniform manner.

The issue which was further taken up at the 49th Session of the Executive Committee in September 2001, where it was highlighted that any measures requiring traceability should be justified as:

  • Having a food safety objective (i.e., as an SPS measure)
  • Having a legitimate objective (i.e., as a TBT measure)

    The Executive Committee further:

  • recommended the Codex Committee on General Principles consider these two aspects of traceability, although it was of the opinion that first consideration should be given to the use of traceability as a risk management option in the draft Working Principles for Risk Analysis

  • requested CCFICS to consider the modalities for the application of traceability, in particular in reference to the use of official inspection and certification systems to ensure the integrity of traceability.

  • agreed that the Committees concerned (including the Committees on General Principles, Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification Systems, Food Hygiene and Food Labelling) to undertake work as they deemed appropriate, within their respective mandates.

  • welcomed the suggestion that the Chairpersons of the Committees concerned and the Codex Secretariat should coordinate work so as to avoid a divergence of approach to ensure a consistent Codex outcome on the issue.

  • agreed that Regional Coordinating Committees may wish to contribute to the debate on this issue.

  • noted the usefulness of a proposal for workshops to be held at the regional level using case studies of traceability as these would contribute to a clarification of the economic impact and technical application, and contribute to improved understanding.

The Codex Committee on General Principles, at its 17th Session held on 15-19 April 2002, has been asked to provide a draft definition for Codex use.

The Codex Committee on Food Import Export Inspection and Certification Systems, at its 10th Session held during 25 February-1 March 2002 has formed a working Group led by Switzerland with India as one of its members.

The Codex Committee on Food Hygiene (CCFH), at its 34th Session during October 2001 was of the opinion that specific work on traceability as related to food hygiene was premature.

The CCFH reiterated its request to the drafting group that the concept of traceability should be taken into account in the further elaboration of the proposed draft Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Management.

The ad hoc Codex Intergovernmental Task Force on Animal Feeding has included specific reference to traceability in the proposed Draft Code of Practice on Good Animal Feeding, but will discuss the matter at its next session (2003) in the light of the discussion in the Executive Committee.

The ad hoc Codex Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology has discussed traceability in the context of the Proposed Draft Principles for the Risk Analysis of Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology, but has not come to a consensus on the inclusion of a reference to traceability as an element of risk management. In this regard, the Task Force agreed to circulate for comment a discussion paper prepared by France and a note prepared by the USA.

VIEWS OF MEMBERS

There is a divergence of views between Members about the usefulness and application of traceability.

Some Members have drawn attention to the implications for developing countries, in particular cost, the ability to meet traceability requirements and the potential negative impact on trade.

Best viewed in 800 x 600 pixels.